OVERVIEW
(www.amoroden.com)
DEAD:  82 FOLLOWERS OF DAVID KORESH, 4 ATF, 2 FBI.

INVESTIGATIONS: TEXAS RANGERS, FBI CRIME LAB, US JUSTICE DEPT, US HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, US SENATE, AMO PAUL BISHOP RODEN, DANFORTH (SEE NO. 4, "THE COVERUP").

LAND RIPOFFS FROM CHURCH: ALMOST 3: FIRST, FLORENCE HOUTEFF EAKIN DISBANDED THE
CHURCH AND SOLD ITS PROPERTY IN 1962, THE COURTS CONFIRMED HER ACTIONS 1966. SECOND,
DAVID KORESH (THEN VERNON HOWELL) DID A HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF THE REPURCHASED 77
ACRES IN 1988, THE COURTS CONFIRMED HIS ACTIONS FROM 1989 TO 1991. THIRD, SQUATTER
CHARLIE PACE WILL ACQUIRE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY BY ADVERSE POSSESSION IN THE SUMMER
OF 2010. (SEE NO. 6, "KING OF THE HILL").
THE FIRE: SIMULTANEOUSLY LIT IN THREE SEPARATE LOCATIONS FOR MAXIMUM LOSS OF LIFE.

THE EVIDENCE: COLLECTED BY THE TEXAS RANGERS AND SENT TO THE FBI CRIME LAB IN
WASHINGTON. THIS ALLOWED THE FBI TO INVESTIGATE AND EXONERATE THEMSELVES.

THE PICTURES: AERIAL STILL PHOTOS FROM A HELICOPTER, HEAT SCANS FROM AN AIRPLANE,
AND MEDIA FOOTAGE FROM PLATFORMS SOUTH, WEST AND NORTHWEST OF THE CHURCH.
(GOOGLE THE LINDA THOMPSON VIDEO, "WACO, THE BIG LIE.") ALL PICTORIAL EVIDENCE
IMPLICATES THE FBI IN SETTING ALL THREE FIRES.

THE COVERUP: ALMOST ALL LINGERING HARD EVIDENCE WAS REMOVED FROM THE SITE DURING
THE 18 MONTH LEAD CONTAMINATION CLEANUP. STATE AND FEDERAL DOCUMENTS SHOW
(1) THAT THE LEAD CONTAMINATION COULD EASILY HAVE BEEN PREVENTED SINCE THE STATE OF
TEXAS KNEW AT LEAST A WEEK BEFORE THE BULLDOZING THAT THE SITE WOULD BE
"SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED," AND
(2) THAT THE BULLETS WERE ON THE CONCRETE SLAB OF WHAT STATE DOCUMENTS CALLED THE
INTERIOR BUNKER AND HAD NO GROUND CONTACT. BULLDOZING THE BULLETS AROUND THE SITE
CREATED THE LEAD CONTAMINATION.
ISSUE NO. 1: SINCE MANY OF THE CONGREGATION WANTED TO CONTINUE THE CHURCH, SHOULD
THE COURTS HAVE APPROVED THE SALE OF THE 941 ACRE CHURCH PROPERTY BY FLORENCE
HOUTEFF EAKIN AND HER FELLOW TRUSTEES AND THE DISPERSAL OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE
SALE AND ALL OTHER CHURCH FUNDS TO THE TRUSTEES AND OTHERS LEAVING THE CHURCH?
DOES THE TITHE BELONG TO THE CHURCH OR TO EX-MEMBERS?

ISSUE NO. 2: SINCE DAVID KORESH'S FACTION OF THE BRANCH DAVIDIAN CHURCH COMPRISED
LESS THAN 10% OF THE CHURCH MEMBERSHIP AND HIS CLAIM OF LEADERSHIP AND
TRUSTEESHIP WAS SPECIFICALLY FORBIDDEN BY CHURCH LAW, SHOULD THE COURTS HAVE
REFUSED TO ALLOW A JURY TO HEAR THE LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CO-PURCHASER AND ORIGINAL
TRUSTEE GEORGE RODEN? INDEED, SINCE THERE WERE TWO CLAIMANTS TO BOTH LEADERSHIP
AND TRUSTEESHIP, SHOULD THE COURTS HAVE SUMMARILY DISMISSED GEORGE RODEN'S
LAWSUIT CLAIMING NO FACTS WERE IN DISPUTE, AND SHOULD HIGHER COURTS INCLUDING THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATE HAVE REFUSED TO HEAR THE APPEAL?

ISSUE NO. 3: BRANCH DAVIDIANS PREACH CHRIST ILLUMINATING THE UNFULFILLED PROPHECIES
OF THE BIBLE (REV. 5:6; REV. 6-11; IS. 11) IN ORDER TO GATHER GOD'S KINGDOM ON EARTH (REV.
7, 14; JER. 30, 31; IS. 2: 2-5; MICAH 4:1-4; EZ. 20: 33-44). THEY PREACH GOD DESTROYING THE
NATIONS TO ESTABLISH HIS KINGDOM (DAN. 2: 31-44; REV. 16, ETC). THEY PREACH LAND
OWNERSHIP AS A HUMAN RIGHT (MICAH 4:4; MATT. 5:5; EZ. 47: 21-23). SHOULD SUCH A CHURCH
BE ALLOWED TO EXIST IN AMERICA?

Amo Paul Bishop Roden